09.27.02

Script Kitties Rejoice – High Tech P2P Arms Race Looms

Posted in forum archive at 3:39 pm by

Congress yesterday (Sept. 26) heard testimony from major record labels seeking permission to use electronic sabotage tactics on the p2p file trading networks they feel are ruining their business, as stated in this article.

This is what caught my eye:

But some lawmakers worried that overzealous copyright enforcement measures could end up targeting innocent computer users, and said they did not want to encourage a high-tech game of cat and mouse that could easily get out of hand. “What are the implications for the Internet’s functionality when the inevitable arms race develops?” asked Virginia Democratic Rep. Rick Boucher.

We’ve already seen the inability for the record industry to develop a secure, uncopiable format – the SDMI project is a failure. There are tens of thousands of geeks living in their parents basements (and I say that with the utmost love and respect) just waiting for the next challenge. If the RIAA and the people they represent think that they can get into an all out coding-crap storm with these people and come out on top, they’re wrong. These are highly skilled, highly motivated people with no social life to distract them from their mission. Given the choice between a corporate shill and a passionate phreaker, I’ll choose the phreaker every time. God bless him and his unshowered demeaner.

Toward the end of the article I think they offer a better solution:

Steve Griffin, who watched from the audience as lawmakers and witnesses castigated his Morpheus peer-to-peer service, said Congress would do better to establish a per-song royalty rate to compensate copyright holders, rather than endorsing high-tech warfare between record labels and peer-to-peer networks.

Yep – instead of trying to destroy the thing, it would be much wiser to try and use this new technology to your own ends. Would it be easy? No. Would it be a battle that the record labels and the artists they represent might be capable of winning? Yes.

09.04.02

Even Carrion Can’t Be Bought

Posted in forum archive at 2:15 am by

From billboard.com:

Delaware Judge Blocks Sale Of Napster

A Delaware bankruptcy judge has blocked the sale of file-swapping service Napster to its chief financial investor, Bertelsmann AG, marking the death of a deal that might have revived the service as a legitimate music-sharing network. Judge Peter J. Walsh made the ruling today (Sept. 3) in Wilmington, Del., according to spokespersons for both Bertelsmann and Napster.

Bertelsmann had sought to purchase the remains of the defunct Napster network for an additional $8 million after having already sunk $85 million into the Redwood City, Calif.-based company to keep it afloat. Napster has been off line for more than a year.

Suits by several major record labels effectively destroyed Napster. Those companies also filed motions in the bankruptcy case, vigorously objecting to the sale of the company to Bertelsmann.

If I was BMG I would be truly piqued off – $85 million sunk into their next generation distribution strategy and the myopic music industry cuts me off with waves of lawyers and red tape.

Ugggh… :evil: